Frequently asked questions
The Absolut-Version of the New Civilization is enough abstract and difficult for understanding, is especial at the initial stage, idea. Probably, it will be easier for understanding through concrete examples. Therefore I shall result the most interesting plots from my correspondence with more than competent members NCN (New Civilization Network), LETS (Local Exchange Trading System) and also other correspondents.Thus I shall result questions and references to their authors extremely in case they will give me on this written sanction. In all other cases instead of a question I shall result quintessence of the answer, and the essence of the question can be understood and from the answer
Thanks for your attention to my ideas. I with pleasure shall answer all your questions. But I warn - to understand logic of mine civilization approach not so simply. Not because it is too difficult, that is why, that for its description I am compelled to use old words with the old contents.
So, as a matter of fact. First of all, that build, which I assert in the New Civilization, I would name as socitanism (from SOCIalism + capiTAlism + commuNISM), as:
·Is a socialism in which everyone have the "feeding" property providing with it full social protection and personal freedom
·Is capitalism where the capitalist is absolutely everyone
·Is a communism in which the key investor is the commune of consumers
The method of creation of the New Civilization consists not in revolution as it was in Russia: all have broken, all another's have shot, and have then started to think what to do. It and not a method of evolution when all goes, anyhow, and all turns out as will turn out. My method - a method of transformation, gradual replacement of old new, a method of original replacement of old mechanisms for the account of higher commercial and other competitiveness new. It means, that all mechanisms we can introduce right now, receiving and social effect, and civilization results, and super profits.
On your questions I answer. Housekeeping earns money, as well as earned, including at us, due to service of direct synthesis - interaction between the consumer and the manufacturer (here will be created hundred millions workplaces in-home with which it is fine to consult competent people from among invalids, housewives, children, pensioners, etc.). Our starting effect consists in a way of expenditure of money. We speak: if you want to be rich remember: when you buy something in the traditional way in shop, you make a hole in the financial position. To become rich, you should buy not bread, and a property share in a bakery.
I shall result an example of calculation. It was done enough for a long time, not so precisely, but the essence of an affair shows correctly.
The average family from four person in Russia spends for bread, we admit, 100 dollars one year, thus the kg of bread (we shall notice - unknown quality, as a rule unhealthy because of use of yeast and dirty logistic, stale, etc.) costs, say, 70 cents. We suggest it: buy a property share in a domestic bakery for 10 dollars, and you will receive every morning on one kg of the newly-baked bread without application of yeast from the let germinate grain (bread which is a medicine), a grain brought up in Orenburg and being best in the world from the point of view of improvement of the consumer by best in the world, at the price of 10 cents for kg. The consumer in this case:
I shall result one more example, with very exact calculations. We made it together with Spaniards enough for a long time, but this calculation has not lost the urgency. The question was a dry-cleaner belonging to consumers. From the qualitative point of view here all is clear: it is not necessary to buy the washing machine, to spend money for detergent powders, time for washing and ironing, to pollute an environment draining in the water drain of aggressive chemical substances, to breathe them of a house while the linen (in Russia overwhelming majority dries lives in multi-storey houses and dries linen on the closed balconies or in apartments).
For more correct description of a situation I shall enter some definitions describing a design of that I name the strategic investment module of the property of the consumer on means of production "Share-Budget-ProduAs in the English language also the share in the capital of the joint-stock company, and a property share about which I speak in a word is designated, and they represent themselves opposite concepts, I shall designate the contents, as well as in other cases, through a label "Meta". Thus, the English variant of this concept will look as follows: MetaShare-MetaBudget-MetaProduct):
Now it is possible to return to the description of a financial situation on a dry-cleaner and to result even more indicative figures, absolutely exact by the beginning of 1998 for Moscow:
·Cost of MetaShare of a dry-cleaner of the highest world level with a full transport package - 10 dollars
·The contents of the MetaProduct - one tanned sheepskin coat, three suits and 6 trousers (with an opportunity of their recalculation on any other clothes in view of equivalence of time expenses for its cleaning and ironing)
·The sum of the MetaBudget - 10 dollars
Let's notice, that for that period of time similar service in the largest network of dry-cleaners in Moscow cost (without a full transport package, with ugly frequently quality, with the courts carelessly accepting the decisions not for the benefit of the consumer) of 111 dollars. As they say, feel a difference - you can make all other calculations
Go further. What is got metashare? It is a share in the capital created by me World FondoBank of Perfect Commodity FondoMoney which automatically transforms the metaproduct in perfect commodity fondomoney, and proprietor of the metashare - in the President-Founder of own fondobank of perfect commodity fondomoney within the framework of which under certain conditions he can create own private fondobank of private fondomoney. And it - only the most simple consequence civilization transition to the property of the consumer on means of production.
In fact this effect whence undertakes? I shall be repeated, I do not know, how in America, but very not bad I know, how in Russia. I live in the apartment or in hotel - a comfort less, but - on the order it is more than expenses. I have supper at home or at restaurant - quality is worse, but cost... It is Better to not speak. I go by the machine or by a taxi - convenience less, and cost... At all it is not necessary to mention, as far as it is more.
There is a question - to what is connected such growth of cost at simultaneous deterioration? With payment of huge amount of unproductive intermediaries which as a matter of fact parasitize on the communication line "consumer - manufacturer". On some products this share of parasites makes 95 percent from cost of the goods for the consumer. Any tapeworm in an organism of the person such damage also did not dream his health. To whom do we pay in this case? To the investor (in Moscow at construction of habitation profit of the investor, we shall notice, at all the builder, makes, by some estimations, 1500 dollars on each square meter), to the official, bank, the retail and wholesale seller, the lawyer, the adviser and are, not enough, actually to the manufacturer. Having removed all these guys who in the New Civilization become absolutely not necessary (why is a following theme for an explanation), are not necessary, certainly, as for function, but not as experts, capitalists, etc. - All of them will be where the best for them, rather than today, application, - and so, having removed this public, we and receive serial reduction in expenses at simultaneous improvement of quality, improvement of service, growth of the responsibility of the manufacturer and - escalating of the capital of the "feeding" property of the consumer.
Certainly, for this purpose it is necessary to create a global infrastructure of consumer capitalization of means of production. But its project is completely developed by me (only for this purpose was required decade of continuous work) and the maximum for a year can be carried out at completely scanty, in comparison with volume of capitalization, investments of work, forces and resources, providing and unknown enrichment of new capitalists (and it, we we shall notice, practically all population of a planet), and impressing results for initiators civilization process. And it is necessary to understand, that if there is a way to lower distribution costs in 10 times there is no way which could prevent transition of mankind to other, to the order higher orbit of economic efficiency. So the question on mission NSN, LETS and other global leaders civilization updating stands more than stimulating image, and such situation develops only time in a history of mankind. I speak it completely precisely and with full knowledge of an affair
Whether there are practical prospects of realization of the concept of the Absolut-Version of the New Civilization? (Continuation of dialogue with member of the New Civilization Network)
It is glad, that to you the sense It is glad, that to you the sense of my model of the New Civilization starts to open. Now under the order that in it while confuses you.
For the beginning about that you do not see its practical appendices. It - is not surprising, as I own English somehow, all basic materials at me - in Russian, the nearest months I shall try to translate them to English, but whether will solve it a problem, is not confident - even those who read them in Russian, frequently anything cannot understand. Either does not want. Or understand all just what isn't needed. But in it there is nothing surprising. Another would be strange - if all have suddenly accepted enthusiastically revolutionary enough idea.
So, about practical applicability. It practically more than is applicable - as soon as we shall impose system of guarantees, it will go with such speed, that we shall see its fruits everywhere where before 2015 by which personally I am guided as for a while when it will be possible to tell: yes, the basic work is already made, process of becoming of a new civilization has accepted irreversible character.
And it is not mere words. Two years ago we have started the first project which developed and has been carried out from the beginning up to the end under my circuit in Moscow. And it has shown fantastic practical results (practical, means confirmed with movement of money): growth of capitalization MetaShare for half-year has made 500 percent, and the MetaProduct (under the leader - transaction) - almost 800 percent to base cost MetaShare. And it was on the project in which three serious innovations simultaneously contained - technological, organizational and investment. It is natural, that capitalist sharks have become interested in the project, and at us problems at once have appeared, we shall tell softly, half criminal character. But experience now - though take away. Therefore, as soon as we will manage to create system of guarantees and insurances of contributions, process will go by a principle of dominoes.
But we, naturally, are not going to wait systems of guarantees, under a lying stone water does not flow. In essence we within the framework of Power of the Sunlight begin full-scale campaign with August, first of this year on creation of base institutes of the New Civilization, namely:
So practical applicability of my concept does not cause doubts, a question only in when its time will come. All confirms: our time has already come.
Besides I want to pay your attention to the following fact: base economic elements of my model for a long time are submitted in the global market and show miracles of efficiency. I have in a kind of a society of a mutual insurance, the timeshare and some consumer institutes of a global level. To a word, and in the USA are shown attributes of the future, I have in a kind created in this logic Community Supported Agriculture. In Russia one of the agricultural enterprises, using related technology, has managed in the heaviest for Russia years to increase growth of manufacture in natural expression in 64 times (!) for some years. So with practical applicability here all is in the best way. Moreover, in a zone of transition to economy of the New Civilization the nearest years it is possible to expect very serious incomes and significant boom. In which preparation we together accept feasible participation. It also speaks simply: if any technology provides reduction in distribution costs in times there is no force which will stop its development. Simply the society should ripen to its understanding. Will ripen, it is confident, quickly.
We go further. What should turn out, if we leave from traditional market model? Anything especially new if not to take into account that in New Civilization (and this main thing in concept) each citizen should have independently from anybody the capital of the "feeding" property necessary for his full self-accomplishment (self-knowledge, self-development and self-realization). And socialism (in Russia - in 1917), and capitalism (in Russia - in 1991) began that deprived with all citizens of the country of their "feeding" property. Also continue to deprive during all life - socialism through confiscations of property objectionable, capitalism through defaults, crises, bankruptcies, etc., and in Russia confiscation of property have returned in the criminal code literally one of these days. For what it is done, is clear: both the socialism, and capitalism are constructed on the slavery only very well hidden, is especial under capitalism. « Feeding » the property to this slavery puts the end. It will begin the true development of a society. As the slave is engaged in that the owner forces to make him. And the free person is engaged in for what he was created with the nature. And it will be - absolutely other society. A society professional, competent, quickly developing, with the highest level of sensation of happiness. As the happiness is an opportunity to be engaged in the business. Those today only elites, apparently, have. But also they are engaged not in the affairs, they should keep the position, beating off, including, from those whom they have deprived with means of existence.
Now about the fixed prices. Traditional money already for a long time has become outdated morally and physically. They should be replaced with the perfect commodity, author's and private money. Which are based on a base element of all design of a new civilization, the property of the consumer on means of production. Here again the concept of a market price disappears in general. There are concepts of costs and qualities, i.e. - concepts of physical economy, much more effective, rather than economy speculative.
And the last. No doubt, today the western economy is the strongest economy of the world. Due to this it also destroys ecology of a planet most vigorously, and creates hardly probable not the best (in comparison with other countries) conditions for a life of the citizens. Which for the the governments amicably vote. But thus there is a question: and what price of success? And as far as such situation is steady? And than it can end? The terrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Latin America, illegal migration - all this shows, that problems at the West, most likely, only begin. As it is far from being everyone agrees with that model of so-called democracy which money and tomahawks sometimes imposes the West to the world. And that business can end unexpectedly enough, we accepted Bolivia. And now let's imagine that in one day all almost two hundreds countries will nationalize actives of all western transnational corporations. Whether will create it problems to the West? I think what yes. Whether it is possible? More than. As nobody wants to be reconciled in XXI century with the unfair economic and social device. For this reason we also create new economy, economy effective, the economy working on all population of a planet, instead of on a small amount of billionaires, economy essentially moral. As the economy working directly on the consumer can be moral only. The economy working on the official and on business, are immoral by definition. Hence, are inefficient. Also should be replaced
Certainly, no. Any nationalization, any revolutions, any violence. Not because it is bad in itself though it is very bad. That is why, that in it simply there is no necessity. There is no necessity not by virtue of the current conjuncture, and for that simple reason, that the state ownership represents itself the most primitive, most inefficient kind of management of the property. And from this point of view nationalization always means a step back. But also time of capitalist property already left and it should be replaced with higher type of the property. This supreme kind of the property also is the property of the consumer on means of production. Accordingly the statement of the property of the consumer on means of production is a core of the civilization process about which we today discuss. Also the theme of nationalization in my letter has been mentioned, only to show that can be, if not the New Civilization will be created which will be capable to solve all questions at essentially other level.
I understand, this question whence has undertaken. The matter is that till our time public transformations were carried out or revolutionary way, or during natural evolution. We today represent essentially new concept of social development which can be defined as converting, transformational. And the New Civilization also reckons from its realization of the history.
What is the essence of revolution will consist? It represents herself explosion of destructive energy of hatred which destroys all around of itself, and only then starts to think what to do further. And if with destruction in mankind always all was in the order, with creation - continuous problems. Therefore the question on revolution, even in the form concerning peace nationalization, does not cost simply by virtue of an inefficiency of this tool of public updating.
In what the essence of transformation will consist? That natural process of mankind all over again is extremely precisely counted, and then, in view of all complexes of tendencies of development of mankind the program of actions is developed, directed, speaking market language, on mastering by the most perspective positions. In this case there is no need in violence which is a basis of revolution, in payoff which became a basis of evolution, all occurs due to energy of global development, our task will be, that the mankind has not fallen down in a precipice on abrupt turn into which we now enter. Especially in conditions when those who sits at a rudder, at all do not see danger. In what it results, we are shown with accident which has taken place with Armenian air liner A-320 under Sochi.
And all history shows, that any violence is unproductive. About this has well told, if I am not mistaken, Bismarck: Bayonets in every respect is a good thing, only on them it is very inconvenient to sit. And in a history of mankind when blood flew like water on all continents, those who did not take up arms at all, is possible to tell have achieved the best results. I have the Jewish Diaspora in a kind. Their leaders two millennia ago, very precisely having estimated a situation and having made the forecast for the future, have made ingenious decisions which have allowed Jewish people to achieve those results which they have achieved:
Any understanding person even if he is not the Jew and not so loves them, should admire with those who during those bloody senseless times has found such graceful decision and has proved to all world, that intelligence in a condition to overcome blunt force.
But the world varies, speed and depth of its changes promptly accrues, and today there has come time of other decisions. The decision suggested by me, just also concerns to their number. And that my idea was more clear, that there was no interpretation of my approaches as creations of a certain secret organization worldwide further, shall result one more example. A computerization. Anybody initially did not plan it. Behind it nobody stood. But it has grasped all worlds. As was in a vein of a natural course of events. Soviet Union has tried to resist to it. That from this it has turned out, is well-known. The same occurs now. People can abuse as much as necessary my or similar ideas. But process of becoming of institutes of the New Civilization already goes. And main from these institutes - the Internet. And the main builder of the New Civilization - Bill Gates and his colleagues on business. And the problem not in that, will be the New Civilization or will not be, and in when it will be, with what costs and who on it will earn?
I would like to pay to last circumstance special attention. I consider process of the statement of institutes of the New Civilization as the innovative project having practically zero risks and record profitability. And it because we work not against the prevailing tendency of development of mankind, and on its use. And process of capitalization of the consumer expenses, underlying process of the statement of institutes of the New Civilization, finally is favorable all - both to investors, and manufacturers, and consumers. So, I shall be repeated, any nationalization, any violence, any revolutions. Only peace, but intelligent, construction of new, more effective, public design. The construction which is carried out, I shall notice, first of all, in the advanced countries and with a view of their further development as leaders of the civilization process which is carried out in interests of all Mankind which moves ahead to a state-of-being of Uniform SuperMankind as GodMankind
Therefore: what for to break the closed window when wide open the huge door close is opened? It is necessary to wipe only eyes, to see the Way and to make on it a first step, a first step to the New Civilization, by the New Life, to Paradise on the Earth
© 2006 MetaUniversity
- the Dispersed University of Gold Section (RUNIVER) - in Russian